Sunday, February 04, 2007

Knowledge: Enlightenment for the Good and the Bad Alike

Reading Douglass’ narrative, I was struck by the huge role knowledge played in the South. This may seem like an obvious statement, but something about the way Douglass wrote and the way he presented things made me see things in a whole new light.

The first time I noticed this shadowy character named Knowledge was at the beginning of Chapter Six. Douglass is explaining how when he first moved to work for Master Auld’s family, his wife was very kind and compassionate, even going so far as to say, “I was utterly astonished at her goodness” (186). This seems a very strange way to describe your slave mistress; the person who has bought you to work for them until they have no further use for you, at which time they sell you to another person, passing you as if you are an object, not a human. But Douglass continues on to explain how his mistress began to teach him the ABCs, again a very peculiar thing for a mistress to do. And just as you begin to feel hopeful that Douglass will live a happy existence at the Auld’s house, Knowledge rears its ugly head, shattering Douglass’ world.

When Master Auld discovers that Mrs. Auld is trying to educate Douglass, he quickly reprimands her, using his “knowledge.” He explains, “If you give a nigger an inch, he will take an ell. A nigger should know nothing but to obey his master—to do as he is told to do. Learning would spoil the best nigger in the world” (186).

After Mrs. Auld’s eyes are opened to this “knowledge” she changes into a vastly different person, becoming even worse than her husband. Douglass says of her: “In entering upon the duties of a slaveholder, she did not seem to perceive that I sustained to her the relation of a mere chattel, and that for her to treat me as a human being was not only wrong, but dangerously so. Slavery proved as injurious to her as it did to me. When I went there, she was a pious, warm, and tender-hearted woman. There was no sorrow or suffering for which she had not a tear … Slavery soon proved its ability to divest her of these heavenly qualities. Under its influence, the tender heart became stone, and the lamblike disposition gave way to one of tiger-like fierceness” (188). Knowledge of her power and her role in the mistress-slave relationship corrupted her. She became a new person; and a very less likeable one, at that.

In these same chapters, I again saw Knowledge creep up onto the scene. But this time Knowledge played an entirely different role. He was not there to corrupt, but to bring wisdom, and at the same time, discontent. This time Knowledge came to wake Douglass from his complacency and to show him where he could gain strength. Douglass explained that after hearing Mr. Auld’s fierce reaction to his wife educating Douglas, he “understood the pathway from slavery to freedom” (186). This pathway was education. And suddenly Douglass realized that he must work by all means to educate himself to read and write. Douglass said, “In learning to read, I owe almost as much to the bitter opposition of my master, as to the kindly aid of my mistress. I acknowledge the benefit of both” (187).

Knowledge opened Douglass’ eyes. But Knowledge did not bring instant gratification; it also brought a bitter struggle, for Douglass realized what he was missing. He had to daily fight for his education and freedom.

This passage really made me think about Knowledge in a whole new way … Knowledge has great power, both for the good and the bad. It has the power to corrupt, and the power to heal. It has power to enslave, and the power to bring freedom. It is all in the way you use it.

3 Comments:

At February 4, 2007 at 4:39 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Steph,
You know I really like the way you laid the whole story out. It made me think deeper about the whole "knowledge" situation.
It's interesting to me how the two parties viewed "knowledge."
The slaves viewed it as a beautiful gift. Something they were forced to believe they could never have, because they didn't need it, something that wasn't worth their time because maybe, they had too much work to do.
The white men viewed knowledge as an evil, because they thought if the slaves knew anything about it, they would be spoiled, or as we all really know, they would be able to fight back against their master's and gain their freedom faster.
It just made me think about mankind and the way we use our "talents" or "knowledge" to get the things we want, and when our plan seems to be working, the last thing we want is for the tricked party to know what we know, for fear, we may have to work ourselves for what we wanted in the first place. In this case, the master's wanted plentiful land, but not to put forth the effort they used to come up with a diabolical plan to trick the slaves, on their own land

 
At February 6, 2007 at 10:19 AM , Blogger MattyB said...

First of all, when you mentioned the "shadowy character named Knowledge" it made me laugh. Nice touch, what a clever way to start your argument.
I found your point about how knowledge can corrupt as well as be beneficial really interesting. For Douglass, knowledge does both good and bad. It does awaken him from his complacency in being a slave, and at the same time tortures him from that day until he becomes free, because it opens his eyes to the horrid conditions he is subject to every day.
I read into Mrs. Auld's situation differently than you-I viewed her change from a good person to a regular old monstrous slave-owner as her just getting used to owning a slave, and that the power of slavery corrupts her. I liked your argument about how it is not slavery, but the knowledge she receives from her husband that guide her not only to not educate Douglass, but also to stop him from something as basic as reading a newspaper. Mr. Auld enlightens Mrs. Auld to the dangers of an educated slave, even noting that it is worse for the slave to be educated, as it will open his eyes to his condition. So, I guess I'm left wondering, if she was such a kind person at the start, did this knowledge make her a "bad" or "mean" person or was she looking out for Freddy's best interest?

 
At February 7, 2007 at 6:30 PM , Blogger Colleen said...

Could you imagine not being able to have the right to gain knowledge? I was appalled when Mr.Auld told his wife that she is not allowed to teach their slaves anything. I blame Douglass' heartache about knowledge soley on his slave mistress. If she hadn't begun to open Douglass' eyes to the world of knowledge then Mr.Auld could have never taken it away from him. After he was denied his right to learn, I became extremely proud of Douglass for using other methods to gain knowledge secretly. i guess I can see why Mr.Auld didn't want his slaves to learn anythign because then they would rebell, but on the other hand some knowledge may have come in handy.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home