Sunday, January 21, 2007

The Generall Historie of Virginia ... also known as The General History of John Smith the Arrogant

Upon reading “The Generall Historie of Virginia” by John Smith, I was struck by two major things: first, the entire passage reads more like a cheap novel than a “general history,” and second, John Smith apparently seems to have some serious ego issues. Somehow, I do not think these were the responses John Smith intended.

The title gives a certain sense that this will be a boring account of the tediously dry details of when Virginia was founded, who founded it, and why it was founded. But instead, the passage is full of in-depth descriptions of the “devils” that captured John Smith, and how he amazingly was set free, narrowly escaping death.

Smith describes his captors is such a way as to make them sound less than human:
“… presently came skipping in a great grim fellow, all painted over with coale, mingled with oyle; and many Snakes and Wesels skins stuffed with mosse, and all their tayles tyed together, so as they met on the crowne of his head in a tassel; and round about the tassel was as a Coronet of feathers, the skins hanging round about his head, backe, and shoulders, and in a manner covered his face; with a hellish voyce and a rattle in his hand. With most strange gestures and passions he began his invocation …” (18).

The passage continues on to describe them as “devils,” “ugly,” and “barbarous.” These are by no means historical terms, but rather, dramatic descriptions of characters to be feared and despised in a novel.

Not only does Smith belittle his captors in such descriptions, making them seem as wild animals, but he also elevates himself to a level of such superiority, that he cannot even write the story in first person. No; instead, Smith writes of himself in the third person. It seems as though Smith found himself to be so heroic, that he had to write a tale to tell of all of his remarkable feats.

Overall, this passage left me seriously questioning the “heroic” notion of John Smith that I had gained from my history lessons supplied by the Disney version of Pocohontus and the more recent “The New World.” No where in this account did I find a loveable character. No where did I find a man in need of sympathy. No where did I find a man who I desired to turn a listening ear to, in order to gain an understanding of the history of Virginia. Rather, I found an arrogant man; a man in need of a good ego check. And who wants a history lesson from someone like that?

7 Comments:

At January 21, 2007 at 4:30 PM , Blogger E. Crowther said...

HI Stephanie, I viewed your page. Just wanted to let you know. Erin

 
At January 23, 2007 at 6:19 AM , Blogger LauraD said...

I agree with you in that John Smith's passage sounds like a "cheap novel". All the other passages are more historical with factual information. Reading John Smith's you can tell that he is trying to play up himself as a hero and a overall good man. But throught his he calls the Native American's "savages" talking about the way they are acting and the paint on their faces. I also agree with you that he seems to be passing judgement quite quickly on them based on their apprearence alone.

 
At January 23, 2007 at 10:04 AM , Blogger MattyB said...

I couldn't agree more with your conclusion that Smith's so called "history" is nothing more than an elaborative tall tale. At no point in this reading did I feel like I read a single fact; rather I felt like I was reading an exaggerated "fish story". Smith sounds, to more or less the whole class, like he is embellishing the story to build up this image of himself as a hero.

I enjoyed reading your last paragraph also. It had a really nice flow and drew a strong conclusion.

 
At January 23, 2007 at 11:03 AM , Blogger Kyle P. said...

I agree with you in this regard "Rather, I found an arrogant man; a man in need of a good ego check." I think was in a good need of something. But I think his intentions were to build the New World up as a place of adventure and intrigue. And the best way to do this was to make himself the star. Although the tale may be eggagerated, I think he gets his point across that if you want an adventure the New world is the place to be.

 
At January 23, 2007 at 11:41 AM , Blogger E. Crowther said...

Stephanie, I think you have a viable argument here. It does seem that John Smith was arrogant and had an ego. However, I agree with Kyle's point to you as well, that he was trying to "build the new world up as a place of adventure and intrigue." I do agree with you that the readings for class due darken the image given to us in elementary school of John Smith. I like how you incorporated textual examples to back up your argument.

 
At January 23, 2007 at 7:38 PM , Blogger Colleen said...

I completely agree with what you are saying about Smith and his ego. I feel like when an author uses the third person especially in this case, it doesn't intrigue the reader anymore because who wants to read something where the author only talks about themselves and the good things that they have doen in their life? Both of John Smith's pieces didn't keep me interested enough because I was too tired of reading about him talking about himself.

 
At January 24, 2007 at 2:24 PM , Blogger Taysha said...

test

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home